Antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters: their evaluation in burn patients.

Central venous catheter-related infections are an important source of morbidity and mortality in burn patients. Antiseptic impregnated catheters have been recommended to prevent infections related to central venous lines in high-risk patients who require short-term catheters. This prospective, randomized, and controlled study compared the efficacy of standard and antiseptic devices in reducing catheter-related infections in burn patients. Twenty-two patients were included in the study with an average age of 47.6 yr and an average burned total body surface area of 38.7%. Thirty-eight silver-sulphadiazine, chlorhexidine catheters were compared with 40 non-antiseptic catheters. No differences in bacteraemia or colonization rates were observed between standard and antiseptic-coated catheters. Antiseptic catheters were more effective in reducing S. epidermidiscolonization than standard catheters (4% vs 31%, p < 0.01). However, Gram-negative bacilli were responsible more often than Gram-positive cocci for catheter tip colonization (53% vs 46%) and they were responsible for all the bacteraemias (5.1%) related to catheters in the present study. We conclude that antiseptic-impregnated catheters could be more effective for Gram-positive cocci and could therefore be less effective in patients with high Gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infection prevalence, as burn patients are.

Peri-Operative Bacteraemia in Burn Patients. What Does it Mean?

Bacteraemias during burn wound manipulation are frequent, especially following burn wound excision. However, these bacteraemias seem not to have any clinical consequences, and their treatment is therefore controversial. Over a 20-month period 35 surgical debridement procedures were recorded prospectively in 18 burn patients. Blood culture samples were drawn before, during, and after surgical excision. Bacteraemias were found in ten out of the 35 patients (28%), and 16 of the 105 blood samples (15%) were positive. All three blood samples were positive in one case ("primary bacteraemia"), while others were "transient bacteraemia". Six positive blood cultures were considered to be "bacteraemias induced by wound manipulation" and seven "bacteraemias of unknown source". Bacteraemias of unknown source were not recorded at any time while "bacteraemias induced by wound manipulation" were recorded after day 5 post-burn. Patients with more than 40% TBSA had 4.3 times more bacteraemic risk than patients with less extensive TBSA. Blood pressure and white blood cell variations were observed in bacteraemic patients but without any clinical relevance. We conclude that bacteraemic rates were high and that there were two different patterns of bacteraemia- both transient and with no clinical relevance.

Pulsed electromagnetic fields in experimental cutaneous wound healing in rats.

Electromagnetic fields are now being used in many diseases such as osseous, ligamental, cartilaginous, or nervous reparation, diabetes, and myocardial or cerebral ischemia. Although many publications show the usefulness of magneto-therapy, discrepancies exist about the utility of electromagnetic fields in skin wound healing. The objective of this work was to study the effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on wound healing in rats. Twenty-two male Wistar rats were used; a circular lesion was made in the back of each animal. They were divided into three groups: group C (control) with sham treatment (n = 8), group NF, treated with topical nitrofurazone solution (n = 7), and group PEMF, treated with pulsed electromagnetic fields of 20 mT (n = 7). The treatments were 35 minutes twice a day. The absolute and relative values of the area and perimeter of the wounds showed significantly lower values in the PEMF group at days 7, 14, and 21 compared with those in group C (p < 0.01, analysis of variance), whereas the PEMF group showed significantly lower values at day 21 only compared with the NF group (p < 0.01, analysis of variance). The results suggest a significant beneficial stimulation in the wound healing process in rats treated with PEMF, which could lead to the development of a practical tool for research and clinical use.

[Effect of magnetic fields on skin wound healing. Experimental study]. / Efecto de campos magnéticos sobre la cicatrización de la piel estudio experimental.

Although there are many publications on the usefulness of magneto-therapy, discrepancies exist about the utility of electromagnetic fields in skin wound healing. The objective of this work was to study the effect of electromagnetic fields on wound healing in rats. Thirty six male Wistar rats were used; a rectangular lesion was made in the back of each animal (4.2 cm x 2.3 cm). They were divided into 3 groups: group C (control) with sham treatment; group C50, treated with continuous electromagnetic fields of 5 mT (50 Gauss) and group P200, treated with pulsed electromagnetic fields of 20 mT (200 G). The treatments were of 30 minutes a day during 21 days. The corporal weights (Table 1) and the wound longitudinal and transversal maximal axis (Figures 1, 2) were weekly recorded and the data was evaluated by analysis of variance. On day 14, the P200 group showed the maximal longitudinal axis which was smaller than that of group C (p < 0.01). On day 21 in both treated groups the maximal longitudinal axis was smaller than that of group C (p < 0.01); besides the axis was smaller in the P200 group than in the C50 group (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in the remaining data. The results showed a facilitating effect of electromagnetic fields on wound healing in rats. Pulsed electromagnetic fields seem to have a precocious and larger healing effect than continuous electromagnetic fields.

The use of the modified Thomas splint for a patient with cultured epidermal autografts.

UNLABELLED: Because of the difficulty in handling a patient with cultured epidermal autografts in pressure areas of the limbs, we have adopted a splint that is easy to apply, allows an easy access to the wound, and is well tolerated by the patient. HYPOTHESIS: Avoiding pressure in areas with autografts is recommended. This is the reason we have used a splint that avoids the pressure and the secretion buildup. This technique helps a better "take of the grafts." METHODS: We have modified the original Thomas splint in two ways: (1) the use of a distant and upper appliance that allows to correct the foot's flexion; and (2) the use of an appliance that can be regulated, is inflatable, and can be removed, allowing the change of pressure in different areas. We have used this method with one patient with a deep degree of circumferential burn in both lower limbs. The splint has been maintained and the elevation changed every day for 15 days. Traction has been made with the use of the Kirschner stirrup. RESULTS: The dressing was changed easily and without patient pain. Good mobility was possible, with genital hygiene and grafts that were taken in 70% of the cultured epidermal autografts. CONCLUSION: This method allows maintenance of the legs in functional position during dressing changes and avoids pressure and chafing. It decreases the loss of the autograft for mechanical effects.